Media

The new CSIRO GenCost 2023-24 report released this week makes for very interesting reading. In the report, the Australian Government’s independent scientific body subjects the nuclear barracking of Peter Dutton and Ted O’Brien to a comprehensive science and economics based, peer reviewed debunking. Peter Dutton has now pivoted to spruiking large scale nuclear reactors, having repeatedly thumped the table last year asserting in the face of all the available evidence that small modular reactors are the solution for Australia’s energy transition, with a similar reception from the CSIRO. Read more

As a new CSIRO report demonstrates once and for all that nuclear is not viable in Australia as a zero-emissions energy source, Tim Buckley explains that nuclear would lock in permanent, ultra-high energy prices for Australians. Read more

Tim Buckley, an energy analyst and director of Climate Energy Finance, labelled AEMO’s forecast “exceptionally disappointing” for NSW. “The real reliability gap here is the failure of authorities to accelerate the rollout of renewable energy, transmission and grid connections needed to ensure cheap and reliable energy to consumers statewide,” he said. Read more

Tim Buckley breaks down the new CSIRO GenCost report out today which finds that a large-scale nuclear reactor would take at least until 2040 to build, cost around $17bn and produce power costing twice as much as firmed renewables, definitively showing that Peter Dutton’s nuclear fantasy is a complete furphy. Read more

Tim Buckley reviews Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ Future Made in Australia Budget handed down this week, breaking down the key takeouts and what it means for Australia’s pathway to decarbonisation as the the energy transition accelerates globally. Read more

The Federal Government has released its Budget 2024–25, which focuses on developing renewable energy and easing cost-of-living pressures. Climate Energy Finance (CEF) said the Future Made in Australia package would make it simpler to invest in Australia, and attract more global and domestic capital. CEF Founder and Director, Tim Buckley, said, “CEF has been calling for $100 billion of capital and Budget support over the coming decade to accelerate and turbocharge the development of zero-emissions industries of the future here in Australia. In the Budget we saw an excellent $21 billion down-payment. It is great to see that this is additional funding, not the usual political trick of rehashing previous press releases. Read more

Tim Buckley, founder and director of Climate Energy Finance said the Budget was an “excellent down-payment” that will give Australia enduring comparative advantage and resilient supply chains. It’s a “new front door for investors” with transformational proposals that will attract both global and domestic capital. “This is Australia’s biggest investment, employment, and export opportunity in a century.” Buckley called the critical minerals and hydrogen tax credits a “strong step forward” but highlighted the importance of additional future funding for electrification to attract private capital and urged Australia to front-load investment in this decade. Read more

Clean energy investors and policy experts have broadly welcomed the government’s multi-billion dollar funding package for green hydrogen and critical minerals but warn rigorous frameworks must be in place to ensure public money is not wasted. Also likely are a range of conditions to ensure only the projects with the strongest environmental, social and governance criteria were selected, according to Climate Energy Finance director Tim Buckley. This might include provisions to ensure local First Nations employment and requirements for the processing facilities to power themselves with renewable energy. Read more

Climate Energy Finance director Tim Buckley, who wants to see $100 billion of capital and budget support for net-zero industries over the coming decade, says the 2024-25 budget is a promising downpayment on this. “We clearly needed this budget to respond strategically, proportionally and fast, which it has done. “It shows a government that understands both this imperative to act to transition Australia to its future as a clean, green superpower and the opportunity cost and risks of not moving to secure Australia’s place in the emerging net zero world,” Buckley says – adding that, after “the travesty” of the Future Gas Strategy, “it was a relief to see zero new funding for fossil gas.” Read more

Tim Buckley on all the highlights of the 2024-25 Budget, which finally builds real momentum toward transitioning Australia to its future as a zero-emissions trade and investment leader. Read more

Tim Buckley, Founder of Climate Energy Finance said the development of the production tax credit (PTC) model for critical minerals and green hydrogen to incentivise onshore value-adding is a very strong step forward, a clear acknowledgement that Australia can’t simply leave it to free markets when other countries have made such significant public interest interventions, undermining global trade. This will leverage Energy Minister Bowen’s 82% Renewables by 2030 initiative, turbocharged by the 32GW Capacity Investment Scheme which is driving the rollout of utility scale firmed renewables by underpinning and catalysing private investment, meaning Australia can power our refineries with renewable energy so as to export embodied decarbonisation. Read more

In an exclusive interview with ecogeneration, Tim Buckley, director of Climate Energy Finance, provided insights into the Australian government’s latest federal budget and its implications for the renewable energy sector under the “Future Made in Australia” plan. “This (Federal Budget) significantly contributes to framing the ‘Future Made in Australia’ plan. It robustly allocates resources to the enabling institutions that the federal government aims to establish, fostering a clear strategy to articulate ambitious goals and expedite the development of high-quality renewable energy,” Buckley said. A key aspect of the budget is the $13.7 billion in production tax credits, with half allocated to value-adding in the critical mineral sector. According to Buckley, this is “a very necessary subsidy, in light of the ongoing massive interventions in other countries.” Read more